Originally Posted by
Bing
For a 'historian' his understanding of how the RN got the battleships and carriers it did in WW2 is woeful.
It's so unbalanced it's almost a joke. The Economist ran an article a few weeks back that wasn't exactly pro-carrier but at least talked about things they COULD do rather than just pour a bucket of brown stuff over the whole idea.
What should worry the RN is this is two pages in the nearest thing we have to a Govt mouthpiece of a paper on the day after a General Election