Originally Posted by
SWBKCB
...who presumably aren't that bothered by the lack of an additional taxi-way or the other areas that SOU is short?
It's more lightly that SOU have gone for the limited runway extension on the basis that they hope to attract a LCC. The taxiway,runway drainage problem, and take off RW20 tree obstructions are basic essentials to have in place to have any realistic operations from a LCC,two of these could be fulfilled,but not the taxiway?. It's a questionable decision.How and when are the stands being upgraded to 320/738 standard?