What prune DOES do is illustrate the major bias carried by quite a few
Kinda proves my point.
There’s an emotive, knee-jerk reaction to defend a fellow pilot who was clearly set-up, but equally made the enabling decision in the accident. You may not like the Ampan-style delivery but if you view this accident objectively you WILL end up deciding the crew were a factor. There is no shame in that, it’s not apportioning “blame”, it just IS. The dogmatic amongst us seem to sit on just one side of the debate...
At
NO STAGE have I said the crew were not a factor.
emotive, knee-jerk reaction to defend a fellow pilot
It might pay to read all of my comments before coming to your own knee jerk conclusions.
P.S. ampan's delivery doesn't bother me in the slightest. Nor does anyone else's.