The only thing you have ever stated about the Appeal Court finding and backed up by the Privy Council is that they agreed with Mahon finding. Those findings printed above do not look like any sort of agreement at all. How do you reconcile the fact that they were not tasked to, nor were they qualified to, make any ruling on the cause of the accident.
Their brief, I say again, was to investigate the conduct of the Commissioners methods. And if you think telling a Justice that he breached the requirements of natural justice in his findings is what one would expect then I feel again that pointing out fact to you is a waste of time.
" i am sure glad some of you blokes aren't lawyers or pilots." Some of us were, some for many years before retirement. I would say reading some of these posts it should be obvious who were, or still are, aeroplane drivers.
Last edited by prospector; 12th Dec 2019 at 06:19.
Reason: correction