" "Couldn't have picked a worse airline boss""
What a stupid misinformed statement to make, how many flights had been successfully completed to the ice before a captain thought he knew better than everybody who laid down all the requirements for a successful flight to the ice could be totally ignored, designed own descent procedure knowing that the weather at Mcmurdo was well below that required for a successful sight seeing flight and it is the bosses fault??
You do not use another Nom de Plume of 3 Holer do you???
.
3 Holer
Please tell us what you think of the Privy council ruling on Justice Mahons conduct of the enquiry were
3 holer'
You never debate a point, all you have ever contributed to this thread is the findings of Justice Mahon, are absolutely watertight. The following is relative to your utterances that Mahon report was fireproof.
And 36 years ago this was the finding of the Privy Council.
"In their judgement, delivered on 20 October 1983, the five Law Lords of the Privy council dismissed the Commissioners appeal and upheld the Court of Appeals decision, which set aside costs order against the airline, on the grounds that Mahon had committed clear breaches of natural justice. They demolished his case item by item, including exhibit 164 which they said could not "be understood by any experienced pilot to be intended to be used for the purpose of navigation", and went even further, saying there was no clear proof on which to base a finding that a plan of deception, led by the company's chief executive, had ever existed."
That is fact, tell me why you disagree with their finding?? or do you believe that is not fact?? Then tell us why??
I notice you still have not answered the query on post 264, Is there a reason for this??
Last edited by prospector; 10th Dec 2019 at 06:08.