Originally Posted by
megan
A judge is not required to have an intimate knowledge of the subject before him. It could be an aircraft accident one day, finance and accounting the next, collapse of a bridge or building the next, explosion in an oil refinery etc
sadly that would be correct if the judge was presenting an impartial examination of the factors, cause and effect. Mahon set out to without any impartiality to exonerate the crew from their actions in flying a perfectly serviceable aircraft into the side of a mountain. Couldn’t have picked a worse judge.