Originally Posted by
73qanda
I agree slow progress is being made in this discussion.
Can we agree that
A) There are some credible scientific researchers/thinkers/contributors that have doubts that we are in a ‘climate emergency’?
B) The output of computer models that forecast future temperatures aren’t scientific facts
C) There is a consensus among scientists that AGW is a real concern
D) There is a kind of polarising hysteria around the subject that rewards moderate positions with a broad disdain from the two extreme camps?
Nicely done 73qanda.
I agree with A and B.
I think C you should change the word “consensus” so it reads:
C) There are a large number of scientists that believe AGW is a real concern. (There are still a number of scientists who think the effects of AGW have only a small if any part to play.)
I’m not sure I agree with D. I think if you just used the first bit it’s ok :
D) There is a kind of polarising hysteria around the subject.