Originally Posted by
anotheruser
But it fits precisely to the wording "shut down of one engine and subsequent loss of the other" ... (replies like these remind one to always be careful how you phrase something, people might always take you by the word ...)
It doesn't fit it at all. If you include mishandling then no aircraft would be allowed off the ground. Are you arguing that fixed undercarriages are required because otherwise wheels up landings are possible?
You obviously have a personal axe to grind. But note that Airbus has taken advantage of the same rules for ETOPS - or perhaps I missed the thousands of hours of operations of the A-350 with new engines before ETOPS was allowed....