Originally Posted by
dr dre
Curry has already been debunked
.
Dr Dre, she hasn’t “already been debunked”. All you did was post a link to the sourcewatch website. That website is another one of the anonymously hosted, biased, non-science, and agenda driven sources which you seem to take as gospel.
You’ve got to stop the ad hominem attacks...if for no other reason that they expose your arguments as fraudulent. It cuts both ways, the amount of funding given to the pro climate scientists is enormous... does that influence their findings?
How many times do people have to tell you that science does NOT rely on consensus. Every time someone trots out the 97% consensus Statement I know they don’t understand the scientific method.
The climate change debate is still ongoing but it’s become political rather than scientific. The skeptical scientists’ opinions are being suppressed by a range of tactics. This is itself a red flag, a real scientific debate welcomes skeptics. If you have a strong position, you should be able to defend it from all criticisms without resorting to ad hominem attacks and bogus claims of consensus.