Originally Posted by
mjohansen
Curry has already been debunked as spreading
false, discredited statements, of
not reading reports she criticises, of
taking money from fossil fuel companies and having her work criticised so deeply she won't submit any articles for peer review anymore,
she just publishes them on her blog where no one can upset this snowflake.
Ahh yes the infamous Cook study.
"Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al (Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) based on 11 944 abstracts of research papers, of which 4014 took a position on the cause of recent global warming."
He starts throwing out 66% of the papers. Then he only looks at the abstracts.
:
Why would you look at papers that didn't express a position? The Cook study has been
peer reviewed and backed up multiple times, any critiques of his study have not.
And that's not the only consensus study, there have been many,
and they all lead to the same conclusion
And you critique Cook for only looking at abstracts? Fine, on that study Cook went further than the abstracts and
actually asked the authors of the study if they agreed with the consensus, and 97% of them did.