Originally Posted by
dr dre
Sorry, can you name his “real peers” and what they “really” think of him?
The only reason you remember his “stupid comments” is because (as I’ve shown in the previous link backed up by IPCC data) he was taken out of context by media with an agenda.
Btw, just because a few snowflakes were upset by the language he used to describe climate change that doesn’t invalidate the underlying science.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...xoCHKcQAvD_BwE
Read this, seems to me your hero climate scientists are basically full of it. They certainly do not base their VOODOO SCIENCE on clear or factual based evidence. Their experiments are severely biased at best and complete and utter hogwash at worst.
As for the lunatic that runs your beloved skeptical science website, seems most of you man made global warming/climate change/climate emergency/Greta Thunberg sees carbon particles and is my hero have been taken for a ride.