Yep, my point excatly. By the way, it makes me think of an incident SAS had not long ago in CPH. A B767 bound for NRT, the crew had entered wrong data to the FMS (due to human factors and stress) so they ended up with a wrong and lover V1 Vr than req. At rotation the aircraft wouldnt fly, and in theory they had pased V1 ages ago, but decided to reject the t/o. They were ofcourse able to stop, and the aircraft needed some new brakes, and tyres.
My point is, that in this case Vr (the wrong one) was indeed lower than V1 (the real one)
but the aircraft never got into the air, simply because it will not fly; it can not rotate enough to get airborne, because of the tail.
So it have been tested kids, it wont work....
