Originally Posted by
Lookleft
Really? Media like the ABC who are definitely pro climate change emergency.
Or just pro “saying what the scientists say”.
Neither is Ross Garnaut, he's an economist yet he is considered an expert, neither is Tim Flannary, he is a paleontologist yet he is considered an expert, neither Sir David (he's the new Messiah) Attenborough, he is a television presenter yet he is considered an expert.
Theyre considered experts because they are repeating what actual climate scientists say. Deniers praise morons like Andrew Bolt or Alan Jones as truth tellers on climate.
and the best one of all Y2K "roone they cried!" including all the worlds "experts" and especially the UN.
Actually Y2K was barely a problem because intelligent people listened to what experts in the field were saying, and on a global scale took measures to prevent bad things from occurring. Sort of how people need to listen to what scientists are saying now.
BTW the ABC had an article on their website about the BoM discovery of SSW over Antarctica. The BoM were very careful to state that it wasn't linked to climate change. You might find that the science might start toning down the rhetoric in the coming years.
Maybe it wasn’t? The BoM is composed of scientists. After looking at the data and evidence and using their years of expertise they came to their conclusion that this one event isn’t linked to AGW. But the BoM does hold the solid position that human beings are affecting the climate in a negative way. That science won’t change. In the scientific community that position is now as solid as belief in a spherical earth despite all the deniers saying that a debate still exists amongst the community. There isn’t.
The only debate that exists is if negative effects of the change can be stopped. Some scientists think it’s inevitable and unchangeable now. But there are zero credible scientists who will back up the views espoused by the very loud climate denial lobby.