Originally Posted by
Australopithecus
Maybe that’s because the pax O2 worked for more than 75% of the passengers.
This issue breaks down into a discussion when really it should be about the aircraft's ability to meet the regulations and moral imperatives to supply 100% of the iccupants with reliable O2 supply. This is just the Titanic revisited: Insufficient lifeboats=insufficienct O2 reliability.
Precisely.
Into every crevice at Boeing crawled the business school MBA.
Slashing with reckless abandon, never striking the vital artery, they achieved personal enrichment.
How could a proud company be denigrated to such a state where forums discuss the availability of supplemental breathing oxygen in the event of loss of cabin pressure?
Just what do these educated fools actually know?