Originally Posted by
pamann
My thoughts are the same with the new arrivals terminal (when it’s built). It bears no resemblance to the current terminal. Where as under BAA ownership the terminal was extended a couple of times. Surely extending it out further towards the Radisson would be better (aesthetically). Do (what was the BAA) own the rights to the original design?
I think you'll find that M.A.G really don't care about aesthetics and more about the bottom line. If you follow the MAN thread, you'll see just how bad a job they've done with the T2 expansion. The project has really been value engineered to within an inch of its life with absolutly no redeeming architectural features what so ever and bears no resemblance to the still modern looking original T2 construction.