Originally Posted by
JW95
I second that- it looks hideous and doesn't align at all with STN's design philosophy of the original terminal. Certainly a step backwards as far as aesthetics go, although glad to see it is only temporary.
My thoughts are the same with the new arrivals terminal (when it’s built). It bears no resemblance to the current terminal. Where as under BAA ownership the terminal was extended a couple of times. Surely extending it out further towards the Radisson would be better (aesthetically). Do (what was the BAA) own the rights to the original design?