PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - A330 Weight & Balance when lightly loaded
Old 9th Nov 2019, 08:07
  #17 (permalink)  
ACMS
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Sidestick_n_Rudder
Rarife, thank you, that’s very interesting stuff. The 350’s fuel vector is quite wild indeed. I think it is due to relatively small wing tanks and big center tank. Once you start putting fuel into the center tank (I.e. above 46 tons), the c.g. starts moving forward really quickly . I wonder if Airbus had overlooked this issue when designing the 350...

On the A330, this wasn’t a problem, as: a) most fuel went into wings, rather than CTR tank (if any), b) at higher fuel levels, the fuel would go into the trim tanks, moving the c.g. aft...


OTOH, the 787, which I fly now, has a fuel tank configuration similar to the 350, i.e. very little fuel going into the wings (17 tons per wing) and a lot into the center tank (67 tons). This, however, is mitigated by an insane C.G. envelope. The forward c.g. is as far as 6% MAC and aft c.g. is 39.5% MAC. I actually wonder how Boeing managed to establish such a wide envelope. Haven’t seen anything like it on any other airplane!

back to the original question - I’ve ferried an empty A330 on very short flight (i.e. no load, only cockpit crew and low fuel) and don’t seem to remember any W&B issues...
yes and I just ferried an A350-1000 empty and we didn’t have any issues either using the special “ferry flight” Envelope.......Wouldn't have worked with the normal Revenue Envelope.
ACMS is offline