Originally Posted by
downsizer
To be clear, option 2 didn't mean the loss of banked 75/05 pensions, just that all personnel would be moved from 2015 into the '15 scheme. I guess those who stayed on '75 would get the hit.
The strong implication was that option 2 was likely as it removed the reasons for the challenge in the first place, which was illegality down to age.
Edit: They did say they recognised that some gained by going to '15. So it wasn't straightforward, but the decision is up to the treasury.
As with option 1, I still don't see how that survives contact with people already banking their pension? The only way I can see of someone not going to court is to give everyone including those already out and claiming pension who left after 15 option 3?