PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Steve Purvinas, legend
View Single Post
Old 5th Nov 2019, 06:27
  #223 (permalink)  
Rated De
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sunfish
It was explained to me when I joined Ansett back in the old days of the two airline policy, that there were two schools of aviation maintenance philosophy; the Australian way which was proactive and had its core idea the maintenance of aircraft resale value and operational reliability throughout its long ownership - which was forced on us by depreciation and other tax rules, and the American way.

The American way was christened “buy it and fly it” - the Boeing maintenance system was the legal minimum maintenance requirement to meet statutory requirements during the life of the aircraft in the hands of an American airline. This was a lot shorter than in Australia. American fleets were kept much younger so they rarely saw the high time problems we did.

I don’t know if this applies today, but it’s axiomatic that Boeing is specifying the minimum inspection regime at present and I would have thought a prudent airline would be looking deeper as Steve Purvinas recommended.

Precisely Sunfish.
Rated De is offline