Originally Posted by
Notanatp
But Sullenberger is clearly advocating, not analyzing, when he effectively takes the position that recovery was not "possible." He says "The National Transportation Safety Board has found that Boeing made faulty assumptions both about the capability of the aircraft design to withstand damage or failure, and the level of human performance possible once the failures began to cascade." I'm not aware that the NTSB has made any such findings. The JATR has questioned assumptions about crews consistently recognizing and responding within 4 seconds, but that's a far cry from saying the NTSB has made a general finding that Boeing made faulty assumptions about what was "possible."
It is possible sir, that we are not reading the same versions of the JATR and NTSB reports, or that you have a better knowledge than Capt Sullenberger of the matter in discussion.
But, what exactly is your point ?
I propose we thoroughly re-read the JATR document, especially the O2-8 and F2-8 observations and findings and the analysis of the NTSB while you'll reformulate your conjecture.