Originally Posted by
The Blu Riband
I guess that's a smart-alec comment, but it merits an explanation nevertheless.
Most BA pilots will try to avoid JFK (and other eastern seaboard destinations) as the "credit"/ block hours aren't very efficient compared to most alternative destinations. Then factor in the weather etc and personally I prefer almost anywhere else. eg the Far East, South Africa or South America, or the Caribbean. The JFK hotel is terrible!
Also remember that the throughput of new and upgraded pilots means many are unfamiliar with JFK. I've been flying there since 1993 but havent had the pleasure for 3 years. I understand many US pilots fly a more limited route network - so most are probably very familiar with JFK (and its myriad idiosyncrasies) (look that up!).
IMHO the radio procedures are very pressured and the controllers speak very quickly, often use too many words, and are simply frequently rude. The hazard is well recognised and the fact that US pilots leap to their defence is not a sign of loyalty or strength but a weakness.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending JFK. I dislike going there for many of the reasons you mentioned. They can be rude, but New Yorkers aren’t known for their congeniality. That said, it’s a stressful job, and I understand the facility is chronically understaffed, yet they do move airplanes as efficiently as they can.