https://www.seattletimes.com/busines...ax-over-costs/
Congressional panel wants to interview whisteblower who says Boeing blocked key safety upgrades for 737 MAX over costs
Oct. 3, 2019 at 11:30 am Updated Oct. 3, 2019 at 12:17 pm
By Lewis Kamb
Seattle Times staff reporter
A Congressional panel investigating the deadly crashes of two Boeing 737 MAX jets that killed 346 people wants to interview the engineer who filed a scathing internal ethics complaint alleging that company management blocked key safety improvements during the aircraft’s development due to cost concerns.
U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chair Peter DeFazio, in a statement Wednesday, cited a Seattle Times report that first detailed engineer Curtis Ewbank’s allegations. He contended Boeing had failed to turn over Ewbank’s ethics complaint despite the panel’s request to the company six months ago for all such internal documents.
“These reports certainly add to my concern that production pressures may have impacted safety on the 737 MAX, which is exactly why it’s so critical we get to the bottom of this,” according to the statement from DeFazio, D-OR. “On April 1st we asked Boeing for all complaints regarding the 737 MAX and though we’ve been poring over hundreds of thousands of pages of documents and emails from Boeing and FAA, we were not aware of Mr. Ewbank’s complaint.”
The committee specifically asked Boeing for a copy of Ewbank’s complaint, and to make the engineer available for an interview.
“All of this information is critical to have as we prepare for our Committee’s October 30th hearing with Boeing’s CEO, as well as Boeing’s Chief Engineer of its Commercial Airplanes division, and the Chief Pilot for the 737,” the statement added.
Boeing did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday. An attorney for Ewbank, who previously declined to comment, also did not immediately respond to messages Thursday.
Ewbank’s ethics complaint, a copy of which was reviewed by The Seattle Times, was submitted on April 29, four weeks after the panel’s document request to Boeing. It cites specific proposals for 737 safety upgrades and generally criticizes the culture at Boeing, questioning whether the company’s safety priorities were compromised by business considerations during the MAX’s development.
The complaint suggests that one of the proposed systems for the MAX could have potentially prevented the fatal crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 last year, and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 this year.
A new anti-stall flight-control system, called Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS, that was implicated as a factor in both MAX crashes, may not have been activated by faulty sensors had a system called synthetic airspeed been included on the jet as proposed, the complaint suggested. Three of Ewbank’s former colleagues interviewed by The Seattle Times concurred.
The FBI, which is conducting a criminal investigation related to the MAX crashes, has since interviewed at least two Boeing employees about the complaint.
Ewbank filed his complaint seven weeks after the second fatal crash. By then, the FAA had ordered the airplane grounded and various investigations were launched, including probes by Congressional House and Senate panels.
Boeing is now preparing to submit software fixes to resolve the problems with MCAS, as well as address other issues to convince regulators to return the MAX to flight. The company also faces further scrutiny in the months ahead. The Department of Justice’s criminal investigation remains ongoing, foreign regulators and investigators have launched their own reviews, and the Congressional panels are preparing more hearings. Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg is expect to address the House transportation panel on Oct. 30.
Federal lawmakers have heavily scrutinized the Federal Aviation Administration’s regulatory role in the 737 MAX’s development, including delegation of some safety certification aspects to Boeing itself while the company pushed for approval of the airliner.
In May, a Seattle Times investigation found that Boeing engineers who were officially authorized as FAA delegates to help certify the MAX as safe and airworthy faced heavy pressure from Boeing managers to limit safety analysis and testing so the company could meet its schedule and keep down costs. The Times also reported Thursday, based on a review of documents, that Boeing convinced the FAA to relax safety standards for the MAX related to cockpit alerts that would warn pilots if something went wrong during flight.
Late last month, Boeing’s board of directors recommended a series of internal reforms, including changing oversight of the controversial FAA delegation program so that authorized representatives report to a new aviation safety organization within the company, rather than to business and program managers.
Sign up for Evening Brief
Delivered weeknights, this email newsletter gives you a quick recap of the day's top stories and need-to-know news, as well as intriguing photos and topics to spark conversation as you wind down from your day.
The Times’ story about Ewbank’s complaint, followed by a report in The New York Times, quickly caught the attention of the House panel, prompting the request to interview the engineer, committee spokeswoman Kerry Arndt said Thursday.
Should Boeing make Ewing available for the interview, committee staff likely would interview him in private — just as it has conducted various other interviews concerning the MAX probe to date, Arndt said.
“A lot of work in this investigation has not been public-facing,” Arndt said. “That’s more so than usual because of the sensitive nature of the information. It’s been pretty locked down at this point.”