Originally Posted by
PLovett
Speeding is an absolute liability offence, not strict liability. There is a massive difference.
All the references I can find say that road rules are strict liability. But either way, my point stands that strict liability in the regulations is
not more onerous than the road rules.
Originally Posted by
PLovett
Incidentally, your explanation of a defence is wrong also.
OK. But would it be fair to say it is much easier to defend if CASA don't have the evidence that an offence occurred, rather than relying on one of the other strict liability defences?