Le Pingouin, the day of our issues it was RWY 34 in use with no high speed taxiway. I know departures off RWY 09 could not be done as taxiway E is required form vacating RWY 34, but why are landings on RWY 09 not done? Why not LAHSO 34/09? I did read somewhere previously that the tower can’t do it because of the tower location and set up. A large percentage of operators would benefit.
As for a RWY16 and RWY09sequence, I would have thought 09 arrivals would be very efficient with a roll through to Q taxiway and a large percentage blasting off RWY 16 at taxiway E.