PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MAX’s Return Delayed by FAA Reevaluation of 737 Safety Procedures
Old 30th Sep 2019, 18:40
  #2755 (permalink)  
Grebe
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mac the Knife
"Almost certainly, the real problem with manual trimming in the sorts of situations we are considering is just that the H-stab is huge and, at some combinations of attitude, (out-of-) trim positions and airspeed, the aero loads make it either unlikely or impossible to crank those wheels enough to recover."

Then why are they still there? As a panacea? Decoration? Tradition probably....

Mac
Interesting to note -AFIK the 767 never had similar mechanical trim wheels but did/does have a few cable controls for spoilers etc.
The 767 with an early glass cockpit and redundant sensors-some truly redundant computers and AFIK had electric trim ( but no mechanical backup ? ). Now we add a tanker version ( KC-46) and a MCAS system which uses multiple sensors.

The 767 in all variations has apparently had few HS related problems.

Those who do not learn from history - do not learn from history..

MY guess is that IF they removed the trim wheel ( by ANY method ) as compared to NG, it would require new certification, cost bucu $$$$$, and then raise more questions as to why no RAT, no APU, et

Or in simple terms - faster and cheaper was absolute priority above ALL else.Those grunts who did not agree were encouraged to spend time with family..

Last edited by Grebe; 30th Sep 2019 at 18:49. Reason: comprehension corrections to sentence structure
Grebe is offline