View Single Post
Old 25th Sep 2019, 09:11
  #10588 (permalink)  
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: No longer in Jurassic Park eating Toblerone....
Posts: 2,661
ORAC to expand your point; as the decision to prorogue Parliament was made on the assumption that it was legal under the then current law does a subsequent decision that it was illegal make the person, who at the time of action believed it to be legal and had had that legality demonstrated through previous court hearings, a law breaker?

Isn't that a case of hindsight is the clearest vision?
LowNSlow is offline