PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Could an armed T-X adequately defend the United States?
Old 16th Sep 2019, 15:59
  #28 (permalink)  
downsizer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Around
Posts: 1,205
Received 118 Likes on 54 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Since your knowledge of the aviation media is clearly much better than mine can you please answer me some questions?

Has the M346 actually flown with a Radar yet or is it a ‘capability’?

Have Israel actually upgraded their jets to have a radar capability?

What ‘operational’ sorties have Israel employed their M346’s on?

Where in your Jane’s article does it specifically say the Boeing/Saab jet will have a radar? I saw bits about hard points but nothing specifically about a radar. I’m not saying it can’t be done but...

Finally let me lay this out there. When I did DACT against an M346 (in real life) my thoughts were thus. It is a beautiful jet with great performance for a training jet. However, we were on our way back to base as a formation and I still had half my fuel left. He was bingo. He was in a completely clean configuration. The pilots told me that when drop tanks are fitted they are limited to 4g.

So, the M346 looks good and performs adequately in its role (with no external stores fitted). Would I recommend it as a fighter? Bearing in mind that would entail external hard points and weapons and at least some external fuel tanks. Hell no.

But it I am basing that on having worked alongside it. Not on what I have read. Your literature may suggest otherwise.

BV
Dude....

Facts and knowledge have no place in the mil aviation history forum. Unless you can post dits from 30 years ago about equipment we no longer have, please desist!
downsizer is offline