PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - CX SFO (main thread)
View Single Post
Old 11th September 2019 | 07:55
  #28 (permalink)  
Bleve
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2006
: ATP+Mil
Posts: 261
Likes: 68
From: Terra Firma
Originally Posted by Oasis
do you mean; don’t report the ‘field in sight’? Because that is the prompt before giving you the visual usually.
either way, even if they give it to you, you can always say, ‘negative, requests vectors for the Ils..’

I've had both 'report the runway in sight' and 'report the traffic in sight'. The motive of ATC in either case is to reduce their workload by shifting the burden of ensuring separation to you. But my job is to fly the aircraft, their job is to ensure separation. Why would I want to increase my workload and hence operational risk by doing their job for them (particularly when jetlagged after a long flight [into SFO!])? You could do the dance of reporting field/traffic in sight, then declining the visual approach clearance, but that just adds unnecessary R/T clutter to the airways. Much simpler to not report visual or field/traffic in sight in the first place (even if you are).
Bleve is offline  
Reply