PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - MAX’s Return Delayed by FAA Reevaluation of 737 Safety Procedures
Old 19th Aug 2019, 14:40
  #1911 (permalink)  
Maninthebar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by boofhead
Here's a novel idea. I doubt it has been considered by too many people, including pilots on this forum:

If you experience low oil pressure you should follow the QRH procedures for low oil pressure. If you experience an engine failure at or after V1, you should follow the QRH procedures for engine failure after V1. If you experience a runway stab trim you should follow the QRH procedures for a runaway stab trim. And so on.

Pretty radical, isn't it?

Note that the MCAS failure presents itself as a runway stab trim so that would mean that, wait for it! You should follow the QRH procedures for runway stab trim! Amazing, yes?
Suggest re-reading the Prelim report on the ET accident

The crew were already dealing with multiple warnings including but not limited to stick shaker, Master Caution Anti-Icing, autopilot disengage prior to the first engagement of MCAS.

The Captain requested reporting of control difficulties to ATC 3 seconds BEFORE MCAS activated.

The suggestion that selecting the runaway trim checklist at this point was simple and straightforward airmanship is hubristic at best.
Maninthebar is offline