But I still don’t understand. If Qantas can do something under the regulations, then any other business can do the same thing by definition. Conversely, if something is prohibited to your local flying school it’s prohibited to Qantas. Similarly a regulator should treat each organisation or person exactly the same.... Isn’t that inherent in the definition of the common law and Westminster style government? One law for all?
Furthermore, how can one part of CASA apparently find no fault with GlenB to the extent of investing considerable time and money (as well as Glens) in working with him to structure his aviation operations to meet regulatory requirements then another part of CASA comes along and allegedly throws it all down the toilet and allegedly punishes Glen to boot? How could that happen?
At the very least, CASA has wasted taxpayers money on dealing with Glen in this manner because one group of the two allegedly involved has been operating with flawed understandings of what is legal - unless Glen misled them in some way.