Just trying to get these two facts straight (please correct where necessary):
1. Action was taken by CASA against APTA after they realised that the APTA model, although initially encouraged by CASA, was contravening to the general idea that an AOC cannot be franchised.
2. Under the APTA model, member schools would benefit from Part 142 operator privileges
Why then is it MFT, one of the member schools, that went down alone?