Originally Posted by AAIB
We have also undertaken an independent review of the Human Factors analysis presented to us and consulted subject matter experts on aeromedical aspects.
My reading of this part of the AAIB’s statement is that their review went beyond analysis of G-force and covered other aeromedical matters. Presumably that would mean that they looked into CI; indeed it would be surprising if they haven’t after it formed the basis of AH’s acquittal. So the fact that they aren’t changing their findings could mean that their experts were unconvinced by the evidence for CI. Or maybe it just reflects the wide gap between the weight of evidence needed to sow ‘reasonable doubt’ and that needed to demonstrate ‘likely cause’. It’ll certainly be interesting to see.