Originally Posted by
falcon900
Surely the issue is that IF evidence led in the trial contradicts or challenges the AAIB report, this needs to be bottomed out?
Quite a big "if", and I have only heard Airsound suggesting it, but there can be no mileage in leaving any ambiguity where it can be avoided.
Pointless - until his lawyer turned up no -one mentioned it & sold it to the jury
I think everyone who has followed the case has made up their minds and this is just another awful waste of public funds that will enrich the lawyers and defer closure for the families