Originally Posted by
Okihara
I find that the many examples given above just don't pass the common sense test. I'm fairly new to the whole AOC concept, so obviously no starting place other than "
Who needs an AOC" makes for a better read:
https://www.casa.gov.au/standard-page/who-needs-aoc
where two aerial work activities could remotely touch upon the issue at hand:
- Trade Operations
- Carriage, for trading purposes, of goods owned by the pilot, owner or hirer of the aircraft on schedules that are not fixed and terminals
Now I find it a bit of a stretch to consider medicine to be a "trade operation". If flagging the carriage of her own stethoscope is such, then so would the fuel in the wings because she paid for it and it's helping her get to where she wants to be. Or her white coat for that matter. If the issue was to boil down to personal items, she could formally bequeath them to her husband who will gladly let her use them indefinitely.
And that's just one cooked up example. The tradie could argue the nuts and bolts belong to his company, not himself.
We are talking CAsA not common DF - I do not like your attitude, you are grounded!
Very simply that is both fact and truth in a large number of cases.
I have been instructed by a "Team Leader" to do things against the regulations in recording matters to a lower extent - how can I beat this? I was not allowed to do it to the legal/higher level of recording information, but forced to do it illegally.
So I shut shop.