Originally Posted by
rcoight
Thanks for the replies.
The scenario I’m imagining is one where the Dr / specialist owns an aircraft (but is not a pilot).
They of course pick up all the costs for running the aircraft, but they engage a CPL to fly them to their country appointments a couple of times a month.
The Dr pays the CPL for their time.
In that situation it would strike me as very bizarre indeed if CASA came along and said it needs to be done under an AOC.
There seems to be at least one bizarre employed at each CAsA office, however it seems mandatory to be bizarre if you intend to be part of the CAsA Legal Team.
In most cases and places in Australia this would be classed as a private operation and be no issue - however certain individuals in CAsA may see it differently. It is then correct interpretation is held by the Judge, Jury and Executioner with significant resources (and if they lose a grudge).