Originally Posted by
DaveReidUK
No argument with any of that, only with the suggestion that legally it's fine for a company to put customers' and/or employees' interests ahead of its shareholders' (should those interests differ, though often they will coincide).
It simply isn't.
And now, back to discussing disruptive passengers ...
Friedman speak, 40 years out of date.
Long gone are the days you could say “The shareholders made me do it”.
Anyway, entirely a propos the discussion, although the J2 zero tolerance approach has the interests of the company, the staff and the public perfectly aligned.