Well I am astounded that the issue of false alarms is not being pursued here
in what realistic scenario would a stick shaker operate continuously ?
how can an aircraft get certified in the case that stick shaker is operating erroneously?
why is this not a "fix ASAP" directive to the manufacturer?
how is it possible, given that the aircraft is certified with this possibility, that pilots cannot readily turn the bloody thing off!?
In my view false alarms and safety device activation's should get treated with EXACTLY the same regulatory response as a failure to activate.
Am I really the only person who views this matter as really serious? what am i not getting here?