Originally Posted by
Alchad
Sadtraveller,
Perhaps I could be wrong but it does no good to make allegations and inferences without being able to substantiate them.
Alchad
Agreed, and I could also be wrong in my guess, which is why I have directly asked him the discussion-relevant non-identifying questions point-blank in my previous post (e.g. is he an interested party with respect to the Max, and does he work for a firm in the same line of business as the firm that I am guessing that he works for).
At the end of the day, what really matters for the purpose of this discussion is whether or not he has a vested interest in defending the Max. We will see if he answers.