Originally Posted by
yoko1
You mean the pilots who were stress-testing new, non-flight certified software/firmware than was never used on the accident aircraft in such a way as to introduce intentionally failures to see if the new software was compatible with the old processors? Those pilots?
Indeed.
Those pilotes who were on their guard, who -supposedly- applied Boeing's procedures for recovery, with a -supposedly- fixed software that had been ready for FAA flight test for weeks. Those pilots, absolutely.
Did those pilots succeed or did they fail to recover in a timely and expected manner ?
Or could it be that in this particular case of control loss, it wasn't because of the pilots^^?