Fran92,
You need to have a read through all the information on the CAA website link that I provided in my previous post - it has all the answers you're after and is very self-explanatory. Have a look at the PDF attachments under the 'Resources' section, including the guidance for candidates and assessors. The assessment can only be conducted in an aircraft, not a simulator. It has been designed in such a way that anyone can undertake it regardless of experience level and consists of both a ground and airborne component (day and night).
Don't forget, NZ now is only what we had for many many years in Australia , thanks to Dr. Pape, and the two AAT cases.
All CASA has to do is "regress", not "progress" , to where we were before recent CEO/DAS and associated heads of the medical branch screwed it up.
Most times, CASA has no problem "regressing", why is this any different??
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled,
The new NZ policy actually goes beyond what Australia had for many years prior to the AvMed changes in 2014. CASA have never actually used a proper test that simulates an operational situation (despite the requirement of CASR 67.150(6)(c)). Instead, they used tests like the control tower signal gun test and for candidates who failed this, they were restricted up to CPL level and in Australian airspace only - hence the O'Brien AAT case. Of course, since 2014 they have been using the CAD test and we all know what a heap of garbage that is.
The NZ policy differs in that they actually allow CVD candidates to demonstrate proficiency in actual aircraft and in realistic operational situations. Once passed they can then fly at all levels including at ATPL, night/IFR and internationally and so it opens up even more doors for future career paths.