Bloody interesting some of these legal quirks guys.
CAsA are not supposed to interfere with business doing's either, but they do.
Mr Buckley no doubt got his lawyers to put together agreeable contracts between himself and his
partners.
Contracts are between parties yet CAsA crashed the party and interfered demanding changes
to the contracts Mr Buckley was using based on HIS legal advice.
If the clauses CAsA insisted Mr Buckley put in his contracts resulted in a dispute, would CAsA accept any liability, of course not, they are never liable for anything.
Somehow I can't imagine bureaucrats interfering with contracts, say, BHP makes with its customers.
CAsA is an omnipotent deity, the law doesn't apply to them. If any of us falsified evidence or committed perjury we'd be in clink, they can do it with impunity.