Originally Posted by
yoko1
so the initial crew error was likely a misdiagnosis of the first failure they were presented with.
In case of ET302, a poorly designed system intersected with a poorly prepared crew resulting in a totally avoidable loss of life.
Thanks for responding, I'll agree with your last sentence.
So it all revolves around failure to associate the stick shaker with this unreliable airspeed issue.
And yet there is nothing fundamentally wrong with keeping T/O thrust when flying away from a low altitude stick shaker alarm, were it not for this MCAS event waiting to happen. Except when considering the chain of event with hindsight.
If you need a review, you can start
here
Thank you, as you can imagine, those threads have been read and re-read ;-)