I don't think that article was all that bad. It simply points out that if you're going to fly a Cabri (especially if you're used to the Robby tail rotor) you need to pay more attention to the pedals. Just like in the old days, if you were going to fly a Robby after being used to a Schweizer, you need to pay more attention to well,...lots of things.
Anyway, seems like putting a real tail rotor in that thing would defeat the advertised purpose of the Cabri, which I believe was to make it easier for pilots to transition into other backwards spinning, fenestron equipped, Eurocopters?
,...and forgive my Yankee ignorance, but isn't it "The Queen's English"?