Originally Posted by
Beer Baron
Do you see the utter contradiction in your post? You obsess over ‘revenue’ and then use a quote which explicitly points to the fact that you could be “the highest revenue airline and still go broke”.
You choose to ignore the cost side of the equation when clearly that is the whole point of a low cost airline. (And no, it is not a ‘mid cost’ airline. The article was putting it midway between 2 different low cost operators).
BB - I fear logic got lost somewhere between analysis and paralysis in this debate.
Rated - Apart from your original assertion, which I agree with, I am now lost as to what your point is? At one stage I thought you were actually trying to say that Qantas had lower costs than Jetstar........ hopefully I am mistaken on that one.
Rask - Cask = Profit... its as simple as that.