PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - YAK52 Missing Southport
View Single Post
Old 10th Jun 2019, 06:43
  #22 (permalink)  
KRviator
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cab of a Freight Train
Posts: 1,222
Received 123 Likes on 62 Posts
Originally Posted by djpil
No-one thought to mention the possibility of FOD jamming the controls, for example, and instead seemed towards steering to this assumption: "The evidence at the inquest was that the plane was in good mechanical condition having just recently received a new engine and a new propeller."
Originally Posted by The Coroners Report
In this case the inquest was confined to the examination of the elevator trim, a propeller blade and a foreign object defence barrier (FOD) retrieved from the ocean. Mr Hempel and Mr Lovell were found in situ and their bodies were recovered by Queensland Police Service divers. I directed that an examination should be conducted of the FOD to determine if any object had fallen from pockets, such as cameras et cetera, could have penetrated the FOD and thereby interfered with the controls of the aircraft. This was done and the FOD was found to be intact.
Seems to me it was looked at and excluded.
KRviator is offline