GG you are reading it all wrong. Me guilty as charged, things lost in translation of my post as well.
Your example is good, just do not put GA into the explanation. Should you have a tailstrike during circuit touch and go training, surely you just come back. And that is when the new wording from Airbus comes to rule. After that touchdown we are told to stop and apply new maintenance dispatch release, including MEL relief and restriction if possible or required. Kind of a no brainer huh, nobody would continue the circuits with a scratched tail.
Well, for some gremlins it might not be as clear cut and immediately obvious. BRK SYS 2 fault? Hot Air fault?
Now, most likely as a result of a human factors cluster flop, a new sentence is introduced to clarify that a fault during circuits ends the exercise with the next touchdown, and once stopped the ground phase MEL restrictions would apply.
It seems related to this accident, hence I revivied the topic.