PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Boeing admits flaw in 737 Max flight simulator
Old 22nd May 2019, 16:10
  #65 (permalink)  
infrequentflyer789
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MurphyWasRight
What I was trying to point out is that the "greybeards" statement was that the first thing they would instinctively do when trim acted up for whatever reason was to hit the cutout switches then use the manual wheel to trim, not first attempt to correct the trim using thumb switches.
The greybeards may have another reason - in the "old" days it was specifically advised not to use main electric trim to counter a runaway.

Peter Lemme (satcom.guru) has tweeted parts of 727 manuals and found the procedure was to hit cutouts "immediately" with no mention of trimming in opposition (see image attached). He also shows other bits of the manual that were specifically advising against it.

Of course the greybeards also had the rollercoaster technique in their manuals and were possibly in their training too. It is possible that everything changed at the same point between classic and NG:

1. "Control airplane pitch attitude manually with control column and main electric trim as needed" added to procedure
2. trim wheel made smaller so manual trim less likely to work if mistrimmed
3. rollercoaster taken out of manuals
EDIT: and quite possibly related: 4. Stab trim actuators combined - classic had AP servo and main trim motor, NG has just single motor driven by AP or main elec trim

Then the MAX removed the separate autopilot-trim cutout too.
Attached Images
File Type: png
runaway.png (195.1 KB, 13 views)

Last edited by infrequentflyer789; 22nd May 2019 at 16:28.
infrequentflyer789 is offline