orca, you asked for an example where a lack of independence of the MilAAIB from the MAA was reflected in an SI finding. I gave you one in my last reply to you. By all means go on acknowledging such replies by repeatedly saying that you do not agree with me though you understand the points I make. Such condescension may be par for the course in your line of work, but I can't see how it allows for the lateral thinking required in the investigation of air accidents.
Perhaps that is another of my points that you understand but do not agree with?