Because that is the frequency that is monitored by all airline aircraft in cruise, most of the time, and the frequency on which you are most likely to get an immediate answer if you are at low level and you have a problem
There's a great way to save money- get a community safety net (formerly known as a listening watch) provided by overflying RPT aircraft- albeit on a
random basis.
Perhaps the reason we have so many incidents in CTAF/MBZ's is because by the time pilots arrive at the airport, their ears are numb.
So one minute VFR pilots are too stupid to operate radios, the next minute they are to .....
And to be damned sure they are on the local CTAF/MBZ frequency when they are any where near an aerodrome, stay away from approach and departure areas when reasonably possible, use the AIP provisions to fly off track, and so on.
In short, fly smart, stay right out of the way of the RPT aircraft.
How does that sit with AOPA philosophy, freedom of the skies etc. being sold as a major plus of ausNAS?
An inclusive system is the best system. This proposal is almost the opposite of inclusive. The U.S. system is inclusive. IMHO this system will drive pilots like myself (low time VFR) away. The radio and CTA bogeyman just gets scarier.
Another nail in the GA coffin. Just wait until the first proper airmiss. That'll really fill the flying schools- not.
