Originally Posted by
DC3 Dave
It's getting interesting. At what point would Virgn / Stobart have been better served letting Flybe go under and cherry picking the best bits from the administrator, rather than take the business on - debts and all - and face all the costs associated with sorting out a sorry state of affairs?
When the costs involved start far outweighing the financial and operational value of the assets, in particular slots at Heathrow.